Skip to main content
· 3/30/2016

Paul Williams EL v. Sheriff Andy Dickson, Carroll County

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that evidence of a- victim’s prior prostitution in a § 1591(a) case is “either entirely irrelevant or of [] slight probative value in comparison to its prejudicial effect”
  • holding a victim’s prior commercial sex acts irrelevant to whether the defendant forced her to commit commercial sex acts during the charged timeframe
  • evidence offered to show a victim acted consistently with prior sexual behavior \falls squarely within a class deemed so extremely prejudicial as to warrant special treatment under the Federal Rules of Evidence\
  • evidence of a trafficking victim's prior prostitution \is either entirely irrelevant or of such slight probative value in comparison to its prejudicial effect that a decision to exclude it would not violate - 57 - [the defendant's] constitutional rights\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Judge Robert L. Holloway, Jr.

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.