Paul W. Schaff v. Donald Snyder

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• declining to consider Second Circuit precedent 12 No. 08-2766 because a “habeas petitioner must support his claim with a Supreme Court decision that clearly establishes the proposition essential to his position”
• AEDPA “applies to this case because Mr. Schaff filed his federal habeas petition after the effective date of AEDPA, April 24, 1996”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).