· 7/27/1982
Paul W. Kessenich v. Commodity Futures Trading Commission, Rosenthal & Company v. Commodity Futures Trading Commission, Paul W. Kessenich, Intervenor
Citations
- 684 F.2d 88
- 221 U.S. App. D.C. 314
- 35 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 176
- 1982 U.S. App. LEXIS 17105
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concern for integrity of proceedings and public confidence in legal process may require disqualification of counsel where DR 9-101(B) and Ethics Act violations are present
- “the possibility that continued representation may be illegal [under the Ethics Act] militates strongly in favor of disqualification in order to maintain the integrity of this court’s processes”
- “We do not intend to intimate that attorney Burr has not acted with integrity and candor.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Per Curiam, Tamm, Wilkey
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.