Paul v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that although the court twice denied Paul’s petitions for writ of habeas corpus that challenged the jury instruction held to be fundamental error in Montgomery, manifest injustice would result if Paul was not afforded a new trial
• granting habeas corpus relief in exceptional circumstances where reliance on earlier erroneous appellate court decision in the case would result in manifest injustice
• granting habeas corpus relief in exceptional circumstances where reliance on earlier erroneous appellate court decision in the case would result in manifest injustice

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Stanley Dickerson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2016-10-28· cited 5×
• Wardlow v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2017-03-10· cited 3×
• Jonathan Page v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2016-09-30· cited 2×
• Mitchell v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2019-04-18· cited 2×
• State v. Guerra
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2017-03-22
• MORRIS CRENSHAW v. STATE OF FLORIDA
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2018-08-15

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Strickland v. Washington
  Supreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
• State v. Montgomery
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2010-04-08· cited 288×
• Jenkins v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1980-06-26· cited 93×
• Haygood v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2013-02-14· cited 89×
• State v. Akins
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2011-05-26· cited 46×
• Coleman v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-12-06· cited 9×
• Paul v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-05-13· cited 6×
• Paul v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2014-03-21· cited 3×