Paul v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reversing conviction where trial court’s curative instruction to State’s improper closing argument was insufficient to remedy prejudice
• “The prosecutor’s comment improperly shifted the burden to the defendant because it insinuated that the defendant needed to prove that the prosecutor’s witness was lying in order to be found not guilty.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Jennings v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-09-11· cited 14×
• Saunders v. Dickens
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-09-27· cited 12×
• Dunlap v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-10-28· cited 4×
• DANIEL D. LENZ v. STATE OF FLORIDA
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2018-04-25· cited 4×
• Mitchell v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-07-31· cited 4×
• Cribbs v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-04-22· cited 3×
• Raymond C. Gleason v. State of Florida
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2016-03-09· cited 1×
• Sweeting v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2018-12-12· cited 1×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Jackson v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1991-01-18· cited 152×
• Schoenwetter v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2006-04-27· cited 71×
• Shelton v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-05-31· cited 26×
• Northard v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-06-12· cited 18×
• Atkins v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-07-28· cited 4×