Paul v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the appellant, who was convicted of shooting a deadly missile into a dwelling, did not qualify as a PRR
• holding shooting into a dwelling does not qualify for sentencing under the PRR statute because use or threat of physical force against an individual was not a necessary element

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Paul v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2013-04-11· cited 24×
• Tumblin v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-09-26· cited 20×
• Lucas v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-07-13· cited 16×
• Wicklow v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-08-04· cited 12×
• Petruschke v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-03-06· cited 12×
• Robinson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2017-01-04· cited 4×
• GEFTOS v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-07-08· cited 3×
• Crapps v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-10-26· cited 3×
• MUSTAFA A. ABDULLA v. STATE OF FLORIDA
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2017-07-05· cited 2×
• Paul v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-03-16· cited 2×
• Donaldson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-02-12

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Hearns
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2007-04-26· cited 186×
• Perkins v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1991-03-14· cited 149×
• Goldstein v. Acme Concrete Corporation
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1958-05-21· cited 44×
• Durocher v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1992-02-13· cited 28×
• Hudson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-11-21· cited 12×
• Mannarino v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-03-31· cited 7×
• Thomas v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-07-12· cited 3×