Skip to main content

Paul v. State

Citations

  • 570 S.E.2d 399
  • 257 Ga. App. 86
  • 2002 Fulton County D. Rep. 2510
  • 2002 Ga. App. LEXIS 1066

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “considering the overwhelming evidence” that defendant had committed the crime at issue, trial counsel acted reasonably in arguing “that the State could prove robbery, but not armed robbery”
  • “considering the overwhelming evidence” that defendant had committed the crime at issue, trial counsel acted reasonably in arguing “that the State could prove robbery, but not armed robbery”
  • “considering the overwhelming evidence” that defendant had committed the crime at issue, trial counsel acted reasonably in arguing “that the State could prove robbery, but not armed robber/’
  • given overwhelming evidence of theft, trial counsel’s strategy of showing state could prove robbery but not armed robbery was reasonable
  • given overwhelming evidence of theft, trial counsel’s strategy of showing state could prove robbery but not armed robbery was reasonable
  • given overwhelming evidence of theft, trial counsel’s strategy of showing state could prove robbery but not armed robbery was reasonable

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Mikell, Andrews, Phipps

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.