Paul v. Rimrock Tidelands, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “Pennsylvania courts have concluded that a sheriff’s sale price is grossly inadequate where [the] sale price was a small percentage – roughly ten percent or less – of the established market value”
• indicating procedural irregularities can hamper competitive bidding process and contribute to grossly inadequate sale price
• reversing a trial court’s decision that a sale for 44 percent of what another purchaser would have paid was grossly inadequate
• “where a ‘gross inadequacy’ in the price is established[,] courts have found proper grounds exist to set aside a sheriff's sale”
• trial court abused its discretion by setting aside a sheriff’s sale without any procedural defects based upon post-sheriff’s sale offer to purchase the property at issue

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).