Paul v. PNC Bank Natl. Assn.
Citations
- 2022 Ohio 672
Syllabus
R.C. 1109.69 — SUMMARY JUDGMENT: A trial court speaks only through its journal entry and is free to change its mind at any time before making such entry. The trial court did not err in granting summary judgment in favor of defendant bank where the evidence in the record created an inference that the account in question was closed more than six years prior to the filing of the complaint and the determination of all the claims in the complaint would thus depend on contents of records that the bank was authorized to destroy pursuant to R.C. 1109.69(F).
Judges: Zayas
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.