Paul v. People

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the Colorado supreme court has not decided whether the collateral order doctrine applies to final judgments under C.A.R. 1(a)
• The trial court did not 13 abuse its discretion by implicitly determining that “other reasonable alternatives [were] no longer available.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).