Paul v. Paul

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• remanding for benefits' valuation using cost of comparable policy if husband had procured it for himself on private insurance market
• remanding for benefits’ valuation using cost of comparable policy if husband had procured it for himself on private (continued...

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Weimer v. Weimer
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-07-24· cited 9×
• Gil v. Mendelson
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-07-25· cited 3×
• Gomez v. Gomez
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-08-23· cited 3×
• Wilkins v. Wilkins
  Alaska Supreme Court· 2019-03-29· cited 3×
• Green v. Green
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-06-06· cited 3×
• Tillman v. Custom Aggregate
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 1996-12-20· cited 2×

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Pimm v. Pimm
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1992-05-28· cited 121×
• Woodard v. Woodard
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-03-31· cited 36×
• Moreno v. Moreno
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-11-06· cited 18×
• Young v. Young
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-05-08· cited 13×
• Szemborski v. Szemborski
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1988-07-28· cited 10×
• Brown v. Brown
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-12-03· cited 6×
• Strickland v. Strickland
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-07-01· cited 6×
• Rogers v. Rogers
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-01-14· cited 3×
• Kaminski v. Kaminski
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-04-22· cited 2×