Paul v. Paul

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• district court did not have jurisdiction to modify the property provisions of a divorce decree after time for appeal had expired
• district court did not have jurisdiction to modify the property provisions of a divorce decree after time for appeal had expired
• district court did not have jurisdiction to modify the property provisions of a divorce decree after time for appeal had expired

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Jakoski
  Idaho Supreme Court· 2003-10-29· cited 101×
• Compton v. Compton
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1980-05-29· cited 74×
• McBride v. McBride
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1987-06-30· cited 26×
• State v. Hartwig
  Idaho Supreme Court· 2011-02-02· cited 24×
• McDonald v. Barlow
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 1985-09-03· cited 14×
• Ellis v. Ellis
  Idaho Supreme Court· 2020-06-09· cited 11×
• Thomas v. Goff
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1979-06-20· cited 5×
• Pacific National Bank of Washington v. Mount
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1976-11-08· cited 4×
• Ratkowski v. Ratkowski
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1989-02-13· cited 3×

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Perry Plumbing Co. v. Schuler
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1975-02-03· cited 31×
• Haggerty v. Western Barge, Inc.
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1971-12-22· cited 11×
• Lowe v. Lowe
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1968-04-30· cited 10×