Paul v. Keene

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• demand for a jury trial “made” before the case was heard by the special master was timely
• demand for a jury trial “made” before the case was heard by the special master was timely
• “If there were no genuine issues of material fact to be resolved, it was not error for the special master to apply the law to the facts of the case.” (citation and punctuation omitted)
• “If there were no genuine issues of material fact to be resolved, it was not error for the special master to apply the law to the facts of the case.” (citation and punctuation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).