· 1/29/2002
Paul v. Friedman
Citations
- 117 Cal. Rptr. 2d 82
- 95 Cal. App. 4th 853
- 2002 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 916
- 2002 Daily Journal DAR 1125
- 2002 Cal. App. LEXIS 846
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that the attorney disclosed details in connection 21 with arbitration
- \[A] lawyer's attempt to inject an issue into a proceeding does not . . . transform it into an issue 'under consideration or review' in the proceeding.\
- requiring a pending proceeding and an issue before the tribunal
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Boland
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.