Paul v. Destito

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• without reaching the issue of allocation of attorney fees, Court in dicta questions CSX in light of United
• jury properly considers justifiable reliance element of fraud claim where evidence does not demand conclusion that plaintiffs reliance was unjustified
• plaintiff could not recover attorney fees in defending against counterclaim alleging that he owed money to the defendant
• plaintiff shareholder was entitled to reasonably rely on defendants’ assurances about compensation, given that defendants were directors who had fiduciary relationship with the company and its shareholders and were required to act in good faith
• breach of fiduciary duty will support an award of punitive damages

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).