Paul Spellman, Inc. v. Spellman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that - 16 - “[t]he procedure utilized by [the town] in voting to approve a police contract * * * did not run afoul of the enabling legislation and was in substance and effect a formal, public entry into the pension system”
• rejecting any “entitlement to a bifurcation of pension and medical benefits when ... a disability pension system is in place”
• relaxed standards not condoned but may be upheld absent radical departure from acceptable practices or violation of enabling legislation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).