Paul Solomon v. Lockheed Martin Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the parties failed to raise any arguments on appeal concerning the district court’s decision to rely only on the original complaint, and thus relying only on the original complaint in evaluating the FCA jurisdictional bar on appeal
• finding that model contract not specifically connected to defendant was sufficient for an inference of fraud
• “[t]he public disclosures need not expressly allege fraud. The question is whether the relator could have synthesized an inference of fraud from the public disclosures.”
• “[W]e can resolve the appeal on any ground that was presented to the trial court.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• United States ex rel. Hendrickson v. Bank of Am., N.A.
  N.D. Texas· 2018-10-26· cited 17×
• State of Texas v. Alexandra Alvarez, Joshua LaFountain, and Dr. Christine Ellis, D.D.S.
  Tex. App. Ct., 15th Dist.· 2026-04-07
• EnvTech v. DeBusk
  Fifth Circuit· 2026-06-09

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• United States of America, Ex Rel. Springfield Terminal Railway Company David A. Fink v. Francis X. Quinn
  D.C. Circuit· 1994-04-08· cited 374×
• United States ex rel. Jamison v. McKesson Corp.
  Fifth Circuit· 2011-08-05· cited 84×
• United States ex rel. Reagan v. East Texas Medical Center Regional Healthcare System
  Fifth Circuit· 2004-09-21· cited 76×
• In Re Natural Gas Royalties
  Tenth Circuit· 2009-03-17· cited 43×
• Little v. Shell Exploration & Production Co.
  Fifth Circuit· 2012-07-31· cited 34×
• United States Ex Rel. Colquitt v. Abbott Laboratories
  Fifth Circuit· 2017-05-31· cited 32×