Paul Shimek, III v. Weissman, Nowack, Curry & Wilco, P.C.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting the plain language of a statute will be followed unless it will lead to a “ ‘truly absurd’ interpretation.”
• \The plain language of Section 1692g(b) mandates that a debt collector 'cease collection of the debt' once verification is requested.\
• if permitted by state law, section 1692g(b) does not preclude debt collector from contemporaneously filing lien and sending letter of demand to consumer
• “A debt collector’s 22 contemporaneous filing of a lien . . . and the sending of a dunning letter to a consumer prior to 23 the consumer requesting verification of that debt does not violate the FDCPA.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).