Paul Searing and Joann Searing v. Edward B. Hayes

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Just because [plaintiffs] did not meet the requirements under Franks to receive an evidentiary hearing does not limit the application of collateral estoppel.”
• “We agree that the plaintiffs’ claim under this civil rights complaint involves the same issue of legality as in the suppression hearing during the state court criminal proceedings.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).