Skip to main content
Sixth Circuit· 4/7/2017

Paul Saumer v. Cliffs Natural Resources

Citations

  • 853 F.3d 855
  • 62 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2909
  • 2017 FED App. 0080P
  • 2017 WL 1289965
  • 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 6015

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that plaintiffs failed to meet Dudenhoeffer’s standards with regards to the alternative action of holding contributions in cash
  • finding that the “fiduciaries could have concluded that divulging inside information . . . would have collapsed Cliffs’s stock price, hurting participants already invested in the ESOP”
  • considering whether disclosure would have hurt participants “already invested in the ESOP”
  • dismissing failure to monitor claim because “no predicate fiduciary breach exists”
  • \[A] plaintiff must show a causal link between the failure to investigate and the harm suffered by the plan.\ (internal quotation marks omitted)
  • plan par- ticipants alleged plan fiduciaries breached duty of prudence by failing to publicly disclose or act on inside information concerning purchase of an iron-ore mine

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Merritt, Cook, McKeague

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.