Sixth Circuit· 4/7/2017
Paul Saumer v. Cliffs Natural Resources
Citations
- 853 F.3d 855
- 62 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2909
- 2017 FED App. 0080P
- 2017 WL 1289965
- 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 6015
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that plaintiffs failed to meet Dudenhoeffer’s standards with regards to the alternative action of holding contributions in cash
- finding that the “fiduciaries could have concluded that divulging inside information . . . would have collapsed Cliffs’s stock price, hurting participants already invested in the ESOP”
- considering whether disclosure would have hurt participants “already invested in the ESOP”
- dismissing failure to monitor claim because “no predicate fiduciary breach exists”
- \[A] plaintiff must show a causal link between the failure to investigate and the harm suffered by the plan.\ (internal quotation marks omitted)
- plan par- ticipants alleged plan fiduciaries breached duty of prudence by failing to publicly disclose or act on inside information concerning purchase of an iron-ore mine
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Merritt, Cook, McKeague
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
14 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Brotherston v. Putnam InvestmentsFirst Circuit· 2018-10-15· cited 45×
- Ann Dormani v. Target CorporationEighth Circuit· 2020-07-28· cited 24×
- Jander v. Ret. Plans Comm. IbmSecond Circuit· 2018-12-10· cited 19×
- Jaime Pizarro v. The Home Depot, Inc.Eleventh Circuit· 2024-08-02· cited 19×
- Bruce Fulmer v. Scott KleinFifth Circuit· 2018-06-27· cited 14×
- Jeffrey Quatrone v. Gannett Company, Inc.Fourth Circuit· 2020-08-11· cited 11×
- In re Sunedison, Inc. Erisa Litig.S.D. Illinois· 2018-08-06· cited 11×
- Jander v. InternationalSecond Circuit· 2018-12-10· cited 10×
- Francesca Allen v. Wells Fargo & CompanyEighth Circuit· 2020-07-27· cited 10×
- In re Target Corp.D. Minnesota· 2017-07-31· cited 10×
- Diane Burke v. The Boeing CompanySeventh Circuit· 2022-08-01· cited 8×
- Yates v. NicholsN.D. Ohio· 2017-12-18· cited 3×
- Michael Perrone v. Johnson & JohnsonThird Circuit· 2022-09-07· cited 2×
- Wilson v. Edison Int'l, Inc.C.D. California· 2018-05-29
Cites
18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court· 2009-05-18· cited 149,772×
- Moench v. RobertsonThird Circuit· 1995-09-12· cited 252×
- Bennett v. MIS CORP.Sixth Circuit· 2010-06-04· cited 202×
- Kuper v. IovenkoSixth Circuit· 1995-10-04· cited 195×
- Fifth Third Bancorp v. DudenhoefferSupreme Court· 2014-06-25· cited 134×
- Kirschbaum v. Reliant Energy, Inc.Fifth Circuit· 2008-04-25· cited 99×
- Rinehart ex rel. Buzzo v. Lehman Bros. Holdings Inc.Second Circuit· 2016-03-18· cited 58×
- Jerry Summers, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. State Street Bank & Trust Company, and Ual Corporation Esop CommitteeSeventh Circuit· 2006-06-28· cited 53×
- Amgen Inc. v. HarrisSupreme Court· 2016-01-25· cited 52×
- Vern Steinman, Floyd Sinclair, and Ron Eickelschulte, on Behalf of Themselves and Those Similarly Situated v. Teresa HicksSeventh Circuit· 2003-12-12· cited 45×
- Pfeil v. State Street Bank & Trust Co.Sixth Circuit· 2015-11-10· cited 37×
- Ralph Whitley v. BP, P.L.C.Fifth Circuit· 2016-09-26· cited 32×
- Linda White v. Marshall & Ilsley CorporationSeventh Circuit· 2013-04-19· cited 25×
- Harris v. Amgen, Inc.Ninth Circuit· 2014-10-30· cited 19×
- In re Lehman Bros. Securities & Erisa LitigationS.D. New York· 2015-07-10· cited 18×
- In Re Computer Sciences Corp. Erisa LitigationC.D. California· 2009-07-13· cited 14×
- In re Citigroup Erisa LitigationS.D. New York· 2015-05-13· cited 14×
- Donna Marie Coburn v. Evercore Trust Company, N.A.D.C. Circuit· 2016-12-30· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.