· 6/23/2014
Paul Sartin v. McNair Law Firm PA
Citations
- 756 F.3d 259
- 88 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1585
- 2014 WL 2809061
- 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 11750
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that Rule 60(a) “is properly utilized to perform a completely ministerial task” (internal quotation marks omitted)
- explaining that Rule 60(a) “is properly utilized to perform a completely ministerial task” (internal quotation marks omitted)
- affirming order clarifying that sanctions order applied to plaintiffs' attorney rather than plaintiffs themselves
- affirming order clarifying that sanctions order applied to plaintiffs’ attorney rather than plaintiffs themselves
- stating standard of review and describing types of errors correctable under Rule 60(a)
- “Rule [60(a)] gives the district court discretionary authority, and a court of appeal’s review is for an abuse of discretion.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Niemeyer, Gregory, Floyd
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.