Skip to main content
· 6/23/2014

Paul Sartin v. McNair Law Firm PA

Citations

  • 756 F.3d 259
  • 88 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1585
  • 2014 WL 2809061
  • 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 11750

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that Rule 60(a) “is properly utilized to perform a completely ministerial task” (internal quotation marks omitted)
  • explaining that Rule 60(a) “is properly utilized to perform a completely ministerial task” (internal quotation marks omitted)
  • affirming order clarifying that sanctions order applied to plaintiffs' attorney rather than plaintiffs themselves
  • affirming order clarifying that sanctions order applied to plaintiffs’ attorney rather than plaintiffs themselves
  • stating standard of review and describing types of errors correctable under Rule 60(a)
  • “Rule [60(a)] gives the district court discretionary authority, and a court of appeal’s review is for an abuse of discretion.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Niemeyer, Gregory, Floyd

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.