Paul S. Dopp v. Jay Pritzker, Paul S. Dopp v. Jay Pritzker

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• acknowledging that trial courts need not be “letter-perfect in their syntax”
• “[T]he words contained in judicial opinions ‘are to be read in light of the facts of the case under discussion.’” (quoting Armour & Co. v. Wantock, 323 U.S. 126, 133 (1944))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).