Paul S. Dopp v. Htp Corporation, Paul S. Dopp v. Htp Corporation, Paul S. Dopp v. Htp Corporation, Island Resorts, S.A.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the non- party appellant lacked standing to appeal the trial court’s judgment when it “departed from the case, on its own motion, long before the judgment” was entered
• stating that “[g]enerally, an election between inconsistent remedies is made after a verdict is entered but prior to the entry of judgment”
• observing that although “rescission” and “rescind” appear in § 3052’s English translation, “these terms, technically, are not synonymous with the terms ‘resolucion’ and ‘resolver’ which appear in the original Spanish text”
• vacating damage award for, among other reasons, \a strong likelihood that the remedies thus far conferred overlap\
• nonparty appellant allowed “when a lower court specifically directs an order at a non-party or enjoins it from a course of conduct”
• “The election of remedies doctrine applies only when the remedies sought are legally or factually inconsistent.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).