Paul N. Papas v. Margaret Hanlon

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that deposing opposing party is a reasonable and necessary step in the preparation of a case
• “We find no-show deposition costs are incidental expenses that fall within § 1920(2) and conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion when it entered the order awarding costs.”
• affirming judgment taxing \no-show deposition costs\ as incidental court-reporting fees

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).