Paul Mollica v. James A. Volker

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Sitz emphasized the need to defer to governmental officials’ decisions regarding resource allocation in evaluating the efficacy of a checkpoint.”
• “[A] police officer’s looking through the windows into the vehicle from the outside, even when shining a flashlight to illuminate the inside of the vehicle, does not constitute a ‘search’ of the vehicle within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).