Paul Miller v. Fortis Benefits Insurance Company and Resorts International Hotel

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding in non-fiduciary ERISA claim case that “the accrual date for federal claims is governed by federal law, irrespective of the source of the limitations period.”
• rejecting the plaintiffs “proposed application of the clear repudiation rule,” which would have required an explicit demand and refusal, and concluding that a court should ask “when a beneficiary knows or should know he has a cause of action” (emphasis added)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).