Skip to main content
· 7/10/2019

Paul Lamar Bowie v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reviewing, pursuant to the APA, an agency’s “finding of no significant impact” under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969
  • noting CEQ’s adoption of new regulations but applying the previous version used by defendant to its project
  • deferring to Caltrans’ analysis of a 18 project’s traffic impacts, which properly relied upon record evidence
  • exercising jurisdiction over an appeal of the district court’s injunction halting a transportation development project until the environmental impact statement was finalized

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.