Skip to main content
· 7/9/1984

Paul L. Wyatt, Cross-Appellant v. Penrod Drilling Co., and Offshore Food Services, Inc., Cross-Appellees

Citations

  • 735 F.2d 951
  • 1985 A.M.C. 1069
  • 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 20701

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the Fifth Circuit has “disapproved the award of prejudgment interest in a Jones Act case tried •to a jury”
  • noting that “[i]f the court may not award prejudgment interest on the Jones Act claim, there is no separate pure admiralty item on which to allow interest” (internal alteration and citation omitted)
  • in a mixed case, “ ‘there is no separate “pure” admiralty item on which to allow interest’ ”
  • “[P]rejudgment interest is awarded almost as a matter of course in cases tried to a judge under general maritime principles . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Clark, Jolly, Davis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.