Paul L. Pasternak v. Denise M. Pasternak

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding evidence was sufficient that relocation was in the best interests of the children where the lower court made extensive findings with respect to seven of.the eight factors
• affirming the trial court's conclusion that relocation was in the best interests of the children where greater physical distance between two contentious parents would \reduce stress on the children\
• affirming the trial court's conclusion that relocation was in the best interests of the children where greater physical distance between two contentious parents would \reduce stress on the children\
• “argument that a judgment is against the weight of the evidence presupposes that there was substantial evidence but it was outweighed”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).