Paul L. Harris v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the plaintiff’s presence at trial was not necessary because his attorney could have presented the plaintiff’s claim based entirely on other evidence
• finding that the plaintiff’s presence at trial was not necessary because his attorney could have presented the plaintiff’s claim based entirely on other evidence
• noting a parent’s physical presence is not necessarily required at a termination hearing when counsel is present
• “[W]e review the interpretation of our rules of civil procedure for correction of errors at law.”
• “[W]e review the interpretation of our rules of civil procedure for correction of errors at law.”
• “A party is not denied a fair trial by the denial of the opportunity to cross-examine a witness who does not give any testimony.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).