Seventh Circuit· 9/22/2003

Paul Knox v. Deborah Smith

Citations

342 F.3d 651

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

noting that the seizure of a pa‐ rolee without reasonable suspicion could violate the Fourth Amendment
noting that, where “one side concedes the other’s facts as to what happened,” the qualified immunity question becomes a question of law
accepting jurisdiction because “probable cause [and by analogy, reasonable suspicion] is normally a mixed question of law and fact, but where, as here, one side concedes the other’s facts as to what happened, it is a question of law”
same analysis applies for warrant concerning violation of supervised release
de- fendant is not generally permitted to appeal denial of a sum- mary judgment that involves mixed question of law and fact, “but where, as here, one side concedes the other’s facts as to what happened, it is a question of law”
addressing the reasonable suspicion standard for parole violations

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ripple, Kanne, Wood

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

40 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.