Skip to main content
· 4/25/2000

Paul Kevin Brewer,plaintiff-Appellant v. City of Napa Napa Police Department Medlar, Officer Deputy Sheriff Perry,defendants-Appellees

Citations

  • 210 F.3d 1093
  • 2000 Daily Journal DAR 4269
  • 2000 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3130
  • 53 Fed. R. Serv. 1093
  • 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 7604

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that rejection of a theory-of-the-case instruction is not error where party is able to argue its theory to the jury and the theory is adequately covered by the other instructions
  • referring to Garner’s “probable cause” deadly force standard as a “more specific and demanding standard” than Graham’s excessive force standard for the use of non- lethal force
  • civil plaintiff alleging excessive force could be impeached under Rule 609 with prior nolo convictions
  • “[T]he Garner analysis with respect to deadly force generally does not apply to the use of 19 police dogs.”
  • civil plaintiff alleging excessive force could be impeached under Rule 609 with prior nolo convictions
  • jury need not be instructed to 15 specifically consider “alternative courses of action” available to defendant police officers

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: O'Scannlain, Rymer, Fletcher

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.