Paul Kellogg v. Wayne Strack

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a Rule 60(b) motion brought “twenty-six months after the entry of the final judgment . . . constitutes a patently unreasonable delay’’
• holding that a 26- month delay was “a period of time which constitutes a patently unreasonable delay absent mitigating circumstances.”
• concluding that a twenty-six-month delay in submitting a Rule 60(b)(6) motion was a “patently unreasonable delay absent mitigating circumstances”
• concluding that a twenty-six-month delay in submitting a Rule 60(b)(6) motion was a “patently unreasonable delay absent mitigating circumstances”
• holding that a 26-month delay was “a period of time which constitutes a patently unreasonable delay absent mitigating circumstances”
• holding that the denial of a motion under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) is a “final order” under 28 U.S.C. § 2253

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).