Paul JEFFRIES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CHICAGO TRANSIT AUTHORITY, Defendant-Appellee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a delay of ten years was \manifestly unreasonable\
• finding that the CTA’s loss or destruction of records through a business retention-destruction schedule does not impute any bad faith or consciousness of guilt
• explaining that “[t]he longer the delay, the less prejudice [the] defendant must establish”
• finding inexcusable delay where the claimant “did nothing for at least nine years. He did not call or write to the EEOC”
• \Laches is generally a factual question not subject to summary judgment.\
• “[l]aches is generally a factual question not subject to summary judgment”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).