Paul, J. v. AOPC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that servicemembers have a due process right to speedy appellate review and adopting factors to evaluate whether appellate delay violates an appellant’s due process rights
• recognizing the unique and broad powers of the Courts of Criminal Appeals to fashion appropriate relief
• stating that unless there is a facially unreasonable delay, it is unnecessary to consider four factors
• holding the right to timely appellate review has both statutory roots under Article 66 and constitutional roots under the Due Process Clause
• holding “the right to timely appellate review has both statutory roots [under Article 66] and constitutional roots [under the Due Process Clause].”
• holding the right to timely appellate review has both statutory roots under Article 66 and constitutional roots under the Due Process Clause

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).