Paul J. Pyles v. United Air Lines, Inc., a Delaware Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that an interpretation of a letter agreement indicating that it was “entered into in accordance with the provisions of the [RLA]” interpreted a portion of the collective bargaining agreement
• “Con- gress intended that these ‘minor disputes’ be resolved through the grievance procedures of the [Railway Labor Act] rather than in fed- eral court.”
• “Congress intended that these ‘minor disputes’ be resolved through the grievance procedures of the RLA rather than in federal court.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).