Paul Holmes v. Bob Crosby

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “parole officers enjoy immunity for testimony given during parole revocation hearings when they act within the scope of their duties”
• explaining that to establish a § 1983 claim, a plaintiff must show, inter alia, a violation of a constitutional or federal statutory right
• stating individual members of the Parole Board are entitled to absolute quasi-judicial immunity from a suit for damages
• finding probation officers are entitled to quasi-judicial immunity in preparing presentence investigation reports
• “[P]arole officers enjoy immunity for testimony given during parole revocation hearings when they act within the scope of their duties.”
• “To establish a claim under 42 U.S.C § 1983, a plaintiff must prove (1) a violation of a constitutional right, and (2) that the alleged violation was commit- ted by a person acting under color of state law.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).