Paul Henry Marshall and Roy Thomas Marshall v. Jim Rose, Warden

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that witness' description of suspect did not match actual physical appearance in a \crucial respect\
• finding that witness’ description of suspect did not match actual physical appearance in a “crucial respect”
• finding that witness’ description of suspect did not match actual physical appearance in a “crucial respect”
• witness' statement at hearing that identification was based upon observations made at the scene of the crime not conclusive
• “[T]he danger inherent in eyewitness identification has long been a subject of grave concern.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).