Skip to main content
· 1/9/1984

Paul H. Jones and Pushmataha Plantation, Inc. v. Anderson-Tully Company

Citations

  • 722 F.2d 211
  • 38 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 340
  • 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 26598

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rule 60 [a] held inapplicable where parties to boundary dispute discovered description of adjudicated boundary to be erroneous
  • if an error affects the substantive rights of the parties, it must be corrected under Rule 60(b)
  • “Although Rule 60(a) clerical mistakes need not be made by the clerk, they must be in the nature of recitation of amanuensis mistakes . . . ”
  • mistake in describing boundaries in judgment affects “substantive” rights of adjoining property owners

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Clark, Rubin, Jolly

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.