· 1/9/1984
Paul H. Jones and Pushmataha Plantation, Inc. v. Anderson-Tully Company
Citations
- 722 F.2d 211
- 38 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 340
- 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 26598
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- rule 60 [a] held inapplicable where parties to boundary dispute discovered description of adjudicated boundary to be erroneous
- if an error affects the substantive rights of the parties, it must be corrected under Rule 60(b)
- “Although Rule 60(a) clerical mistakes need not be made by the clerk, they must be in the nature of recitation of amanuensis mistakes . . . ”
- mistake in describing boundaries in judgment affects “substantive” rights of adjoining property owners
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Clark, Rubin, Jolly
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.