Paul G. Shultz v. Department of Army, United States of America

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Trails ‘running into wild, unenclosed and uncultivated country5 do not meet the minimum standard of definiteness (they lack one terminus
• “Our decision must take into account the fact that conditions in Alaska present unique questions ... What might be considered sporadic use in another context would be consistent or constant use in Alaska.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).