Paul E. Farrell Frances G. Farrell v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that statute controlled because it “flatly contradicted” the regulation
• “It is well-set- tled that when a regulation conflicts with a subsequently enacted statute, the statute controls and voids that regula- tion.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).