Paul E. Dumas v. Richard S. Schweiker, Secretary of Health and Human Services

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that vocational expert’s testimony satisfied Commissioner’s evidentia-ry burden where it was based on substantial record evidence
• holding that vocational expert’s testimony satisfied Commissioner’s evidentiary burden where it was based on substantial record evidence
• holding that ALJ “is entitled to rely not only on what the record says, but also on what it does not say”
• holding that the Commissioner is entitled to rely not only on what the record says, but also on what it does not say
• holding that the Commissioner is entitled to rely not only on what the record says, but also on what it does not say
• holding that ALJ “is entitled to rely not only on what the record says, but also on what it does not say”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).