Paul Decker v. GE Healthcare Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• a patient with renal disease received MRI with gadolinium-based agents known to cause debilitating disease in renal impaired patients
• “An erroneous evidentiary ruling amounts to reversible error, justifying a new trial, only if it was not harmless; that is, only if it affected the outcome of the trial.” (internal citation and quotation omitted)
• “[A] party proffering expert testimony must show by a ‘preponderance of proof’ that the expert whose testimony is being offered is qualified and will testify to scientific knowledge that will assist the trier of fact in understanding and disposing of relevant issues.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).