Skip to main content
· 12/8/1987

Paul Dayton v. Czechoslovak Socialist Republic Joseph E. Stiassni v. Czechoslovak Socialist Republic

Citations

  • 834 F.2d 203
  • 266 U.S. App. D.C. 177
  • 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 16078

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • indicating that section 1605(a)(3) is inapplicable where plaintiff failed to identify property at issue in the United States nor any property exchanged therefor

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gesell, Ginsburg, Starr

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.