Skip to main content
· 7/27/1984

PAUL D. v. Superior Court

Citations

  • 158 Cal. App. 3d 838
  • 205 Cal. Rptr. 77
  • 1984 Cal. App. LEXIS 2362

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that probation department abused its discretion by adhering to an automatic policy

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.