· 9/19/1985
Paul D. Gandola and Noble F. Jones v. Federal Trade Commission
Citations
- 773 F.2d 308
- 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 15276
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “A reduction in force may not be used as a disguised adverse action to remove or demote a particu- lar employee.”
- “A reduction in force involves two steps. First, the agency determines which positions to abolish. Second, it selects the people to be eliminated serving in those positions on the basis of their retention standing.”
- “If the definition of “competitive service,” under 5 U.S.C. § 2102, agency proves that the reduction in force regulations were which is “all civil service positions in the executive branch, invoked for a legitimate reason and that those regulations except (A
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Friedman, Rich, Bennett
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.