Skip to main content
· 9/19/1985

Paul D. Gandola and Noble F. Jones v. Federal Trade Commission

Citations

  • 773 F.2d 308
  • 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 15276

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “A reduction in force may not be used as a disguised adverse action to remove or demote a particu- lar employee.”
  • “A reduction in force involves two steps. First, the agency determines which positions to abolish. Second, it selects the people to be eliminated serving in those positions on the basis of their retention standing.”
  • “If the definition of “competitive service,” under 5 U.S.C. § 2102, agency proves that the reduction in force regulations were which is “all civil service positions in the executive branch, invoked for a legitimate reason and that those regulations except (A

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Friedman, Rich, Bennett

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.