Paul C. Gebhard v. Royce Aluminum Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting “Plaintiff’s explanation . . . that thereafter ‘he accepted the checks because he had to,’ but that he never agreed to any change”
• since employer could discharge employee at will at any time, employer could equally initiate modifications to an employment contract at any time, except as to accrued matters, and the employee can accept the new conditions or quit

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).