Skip to main content
· 2/20/2014

Paul Augustus Howell v. State of Florida

Citations

  • 133 So. 3d 511
  • 39 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 89
  • 2014 WL 659943
  • 2014 Fla. LEXIS 708

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • observing that Sell applies in Florida in cases involving the involuntary medication of forensic clients to restore competency to stand trial
  • observing that this Court has, \prior to any directly applicable precedent from the United States Supreme Court as to the standard for an Eighth Amendment claim based on a challenge ... addressed [the issue.]\
  • rejecting Howell’s attempt to satisfy the burden of proof regarding the constitutionality of midazo-lam by demonstrating weaknesses of the State’s testimony
  • “[Howell] failed to establish that even if he reacted to midazolam in an unexpected manner, he would undergo needless suffering.” (emphasis supplied)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Polston, Pariente, Lewis, Quince, Canady, Labarga, Perry

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.