Paul Ashley, AKA Walter Paul Foster v. The State of Washington

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that failure to name custodian as 22 respondent “could be cured by amendment”
• noting that failure to name custodian as 15 respondent “could be cured by amendment”
• noting that failure to name custodian as 22 respondent “could be cured by amendment”
• noting that failure to name custodian as 15 respondent “could be cured by amendment”
• “The actual person who is [the] 4 custodian [of the petitioner] must be the respondent.”
• “The actual person who is [the] custodian [of the petitioner] must be the 9 respondent.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).