Paul Allen Frumkin v. Mayo Clinic, Paul Allen Frumkin v. Mayo Clinic

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that\considerable defer- ence\ should be given to a district court's decision whether to dismiss in response to plaintiff's intimidation of witnesses
• explaining that a restraining order prohibiting plaintiff from contacting defendant’s agents, witnesses, and consultants “was well within the district court’s discretion to craft an appropriate remedy” after plaintiff called two defense witnesses and threatened to kill them
• noting the significance of the \verbal formulae\ when granting a new trial
• upholding sanction in response to litigant threatening witnesses
• upholding sanction in response to litigant threatening witnesses
• upholding sanction in response to litigant threatening witnesses

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).